Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Peck
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Cass Circuit Court; Joseph M. Babb, Special Judge. Action by Charles M. Peck against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment on a verdict for $4,000, defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court—43 Ind. App. 316. Transferred back to the Appellate Court—172 Ind. 19. Retransferred to the Supreme Court—44 Ind. App. 62.) Retransferred to the Appellate Court. (Retransferred to the Supreme Court — 45 Ind. App. —.
1Per curiam
This action was prosecuted by appellee in the Cass Circuit Court to recover for personal injuries sustained on account of the negligence of appellant railway company. Prom a judgment awarding appellee the sum of $4,000, appellant, through its counsel, prayed and took an appeal to the Appellate Court, and the cause was docketed as an appeal pending in such court. Under the assign*565ment of errors, that each paragraph of the complaint was insufficient in facts, appellant’s counsel sought to raise the question that section one of the employers’ liability act (Acts 1893, p. 294, §8017 Burns 1908),…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Evans v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. PeytonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ex parte FranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Partlow v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
- Blair v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- State, Ex Rel. v. Superior Court of Marion CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
- Tyson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.