Bryant v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

The writer respectfully dissents from' the reversal of the trial court judgment.

The facts are virtually undisputed, and the appeal presents purely a question of law, which the trial court resolved correctly in the writer’s opinion. As the writer shall set forth in more detail, the trial court correctly characterized as a matter of law the relationship between the plaintiff Bryant and Mullins & Parker as that of employer-employee, or principal-contractor, instead of “vendor-purchaser” as held by this court’s majority. . '

The evidence shows that in fact Mullins & Parker had the exclusive…