Legal Opinion

Saulsberry v. Saulsberry

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 24, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court bt

Judge Cammack

— Affirming.

W. P. and J. P. Saulsberry and tbeir sisters, Betty Rupert and Charlotte Wilsch, are the joint owners of a large boundary of mineral lands in Carter County. These lands have been in the Saulsberry family for a number of years. For some 10 years prior to the institution of this action in March, 1939, J. P. Saulsberry operated the clay mines on the property under a lease from his brother and sisters. ■ The .joint owners had entered into a written contract in 1933 under which they agreed to hold the lands together as tenants in common. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Courts v. Courts' GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Fox v. BurgherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Hudson v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  4. Barrett v. Leyman Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Atchison v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  2. Missouri State Highway Commission v. StoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Gray v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  4. Creque v. Texaco Antilles, Ltd.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2001
  5. Atchison v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API