Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Leyman Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 14, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the! Court by

Judge Cammack

Affirming.

Julia Barrett purchased a used automobile from the Leyman Motor Company in August, 1937. She instituted this action in January, 1939, alleging that she had been induced to purchase the automobile through the false and fraudulent statements of the agents of the company as to its condition. She alleged that it was supposed to have been in good mechanical condition and free from all defects and that it carried a new car guarantee when in fact the company and its agents knew that the car was in an imperfect mechanical condition and needed repairs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hopkinsville Motor Company v. MassieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. E. R. Spotswood & Son v. Lafayette-Phoenix GarageCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  3. Smith v. RustAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  4. H. C. Whitmer Company v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Saulsberry v. SaulsberryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  2. Hudson v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Black Motor Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API