Legal Opinion
Clinical Products Limited v. Brenner
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 2, 1966No. Civ. A. 1032-64PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, District Judge.
This is a civil action under 35 U.S.C. § 145 in which plaintiff seeks to obtain a patent containing the following claim:
41. The use as a sustained release therapeutic agent in the body of ephedrine adsorbed upon polystyrene sulphonic acid.
In addition to substantively rejecting the claimed subject matter as obvious and unpatentable over the cited prior art, the Patent Office tribunals also formally rejected the claim as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112 and as failing to come within a statutory class „ , , ,. ... ,, , or. of patentable subject matter under 35 rr a n o •,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. BrennerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Application of Charles L. Faust and John E. CliffordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Agrashell, Inc. v. Hammons Products Company, Hammons Products Company v. Agrashell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Grinnell Corp. v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Agrashell, Inc. v. Hammons Products Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1967
- Grinnell Corporation v. Virginia Electric & Power CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.