State v. Coardes
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a juiy trial, of possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-278 (b) and possession of a controlled substance in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (c). The sole issue before us is whether, in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress, the trial court properly concluded that the police officers had sufficient information to justify a Terry1 stop of the defendant’s vehicle. We conclude that the sum total of the information known to the…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. LammeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. TrineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. ColvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. AndersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BolanosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. CoardesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. Thorne, No. Mv98-0283001 (Aug. 16, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999