Legal Opinion

State v. Coardes

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 24, 1998No. AC 16491PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a juiy trial, of possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-278 (b) and possession of a controlled substance in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (c). The sole issue before us is whether, in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress, the trial court properly concluded that the police officers had sufficient information to justify a Terry1 stop of the defendant’s vehicle. We conclude that the sum total of the information known to the…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. LammeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. State v. TrineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. State v. ColvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. State v. AndersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BolanosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. State v. CoardesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. State v. Thorne, No. Mv98-0283001 (Aug. 16, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API