Legal Opinion
In Re Convertible Rowing Exerciser Patent Lit.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 23, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 85-119 MMS. Master File No. Misc. 85-14. MDL No. 623PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
616 F.Supp. 1134 (1985)
In re CONVERTIBLE ROWING EXERCISER PATENT LITIGATION.
DIVERSIFIED PRODUCTS CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
WESLO DESIGN INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Utah Corporation, Defendant.
Civ. A. No. 85-119 MMS. Master File No. Misc. 85-14. MDL No. 623.
United States District Court, D. Delaware.
July 23, 1985.
Harold J. Birch, and Alan I. Cantor, Banner, Birch, McKie & Beckett, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.
Peter Sieglaff, Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, Del. (Thomas J. Rossa, Trask & Britt, Salt Lake City, Utah, of counsel), for defendant Weslo Intern., Inc.
Lyn M. Schlitt,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- D.M.I., Inc. v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Richard Lawrence Stevenson v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Stevenson v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Beloit Corporation, Complainant-Appellant v. Valmet Oy, Tvw Paper MacHines Inc., United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Akzona Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Bruce v. MartinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Farrel Corporation v. United States International Trade Commission, and Pomini Farrel S.P.A. And Pomini, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Amgen, Inc. v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- In Re Convertible Rowing Exerciser Patent LitigationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.