Legal Opinion
Akzona Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 2, 1987No. Civ. A. 84-10 LONPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LONGOBARDI, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Akzona Incorporated (“Akzo-na”), Enka B.V. of Holland (“Enka”) and Aramide Maatschappij VoF 1 have brought this action pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202, 2 seeking a judgment that six patents relating to aramid fibers assigned to the E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company (“DuPont”) are invalid, unenforceable and non-infringed. 3 These high-strength, low density synthetic aramid fibers are manufactured from high molecular weight aromatic polyamide materials, see Docket Item (“D.I.”) 1, 118; N.V. Akzo v. E.I. DuPont de…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Vivid Technologies, Inc. v. American Science & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Biacore, AB v. Thermo Bioanalysis Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Erbamont Inc. v. Cetus Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- Yoon Ja Kim v. Sara Lee Bakery Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Fusco v. Rome Cable Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.