Legal Opinion
Bruce v. Martin
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 8, 1988No. 87 Civ. 7737 (RWS)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a) and 21 for an order granting leave to amend their complaint to add additional defendants and under Fed.R.Civ.P. 65 for an order enjoining defendants Kinderhill Corporation, Kinderhill Select Bloodstock, Inc., Kinderhill Financial Services, Kinder-hill Investment Co. (collectively, “Kinder-hill”), Thomas A. Martin (“Martin”) and the proposed additional defendants from taking any action to prosecute collection suits based on promissory notes other than as a counterclaim or other action in this court. Oral argument was…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos Litigation)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- White v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- Neuman v. GoldbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.