Jackman v. Rosenbaum Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
The plaintiff in error,. the original plaintiff, owned a theatre building in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, a wall of which went to the edge of his line. ' Proceeding under a statute of Pennsylvania, the defendant, owner of the adjoining land, began to build a party wall, intending to incorporate the plaintiff’s wall. . The city-authorities decided that the latter was not safe and ordered it to be removed, which was done by the contractor employed by the defendant. The plaintiff later brought this suit. The declaration did not set up that the entry upon the plaintiff’s land was unlawful, but…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Ownbey v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Wurts v. HoaglandSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
3Cited by165 opinions
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.