Legal Opinion

Patelunas v. Laflin Boro

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 30, 2025No. 3:24-cv-02190Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JEROME J. PATELUNAS, II CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-2190 Plaintiff, v. (Judge Mariani) LAFLIN BORO, et al. (Magistrate Judge Latella) Defendants. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION I. Introduction Federal pleading requirements are relatively simple: all that is required under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is a short and plain statement explaining the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction, “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief,” and a demand for the relief sought. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a).…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API