Legal Opinion
Zuehlsdorf v. Simi Valley Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 1, 2007No. B188203PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COFFEE, J.
Appellants are the Simi Valley Unified School District, Royal High School, the Marmonte Athletic League and its individual members. They prevented a student, Jessica Zuehlsdorf, from participating in high school athletics. Respondent David Zuehlsdorf, her father and guardian ad litem, filed a writ of mandate and an application for a temporary restraining order against appellants. His daughter was reinstated in the athletic program. The trial court awarded respondent $6,344 in attorney fees pursuant to Government Code section 800. Appellants argue that the court erred because…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Halaco Engineering Co. v. South Central Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Castro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Kreutzer v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Gilbert v. National Enquirer, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brown v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Sharif v. Mehusa, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Active Properties, LLC v. CabreraAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2016
- Pont v. Pont, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Active Properties LLC v. CabreraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.