Legal Opinion
Wohlfeil v. Murray MacHinery, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 15, 1984No. C1-83-1169PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
This is a product liability case. Plaintiff Wohlfeil appeals from orders of the Henne-pin County District Court granting a motion for a directed verdict and denying a new trial. Wohlfeil had alleged that the Mighty Mure log splitter he rented, manufactured by defendant Murray, was defective. Murray denied the allegations and impleaded McGarvie’s Outdoor Shop, which rented the log splitter to Wohlfeil. At the close of plaintiffs case, Murray moved for a directed verdict.
The trial court granted the motion, concluding that the evidence presented by plaintiff was, as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Midland National Bank of Minneapolis v. PerranoskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Reinhardt v. ColtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Hiber v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Walton v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Fairview Hospital & Health Care Services v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Dahlbeck v. DICO Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Block v. Target Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Rua Do Chui Le, Husband and Wife v. Wal-Mart StoresCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Elias v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.