Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Jackson

California Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1967No. S. F. 22379Published

1Opinion of the Court

67 Cal.2d 245 (1967)

GARLAND JACKSON, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

JACKIE CAROL JACKSON, Defendant and Respondent.

S. F. No. 22379.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Aug. 11, 1967.

Cullen A. Stinnett for Plaintiff and Appellant.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.

McCOMB, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff-husband in what was originally an annulment suit from the order of the trial court denying a motion to cancel all previous orders by which he was directed to pay attorney's fees, maintenance, and court costs.

Facts:plaintiff, aged 21, and defendant were married in Nevada on November 9, 1964.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. McNamara v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Estate of WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Jackson v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Hill v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API