Hanks v. City of Port Arthur
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtO’Quinn, J.
Appellants, H. M. Hanks and his wife, Hennie Hanks, brought this suit against the city of Port Arthur for damages to Mrs. Hanks, alleged to hare been caused by her stepping into a depression or hole in the sidewalk of one of the public streets, causing her to fall and receive serious physical injuries. The usual, cust&mary, and proper allegations are contained in appellants’ petition with reference to negligence on the part of the city, the existence of the defect in the sidewalk, and freedom from negligence on the part of the injured plaintiff.
Appellee answered by general demurrer, a special…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Galveston v. PosnainskyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Cawthorn v. City of HoustonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- City of Amarillo v. TutorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- White v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- City of Dallas v. ShowsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- City of Terrell v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- City of Galveston v. LebohmCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Allen v. City of NavasotaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930