National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Crocker
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Willett
This insurance-coverage case comes to us on certified questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. 1 The principal issue is whether an insurer has a duty to notify an additional insured 2 of available liability coverage. On the facts presented, we conclude that Texas law imposes no such extra-contractual duty. We further hold that an insurer’s actual knowledge that an additional insured has been served with process does not establish as a matter of law that the insurer has not been prejudiced by the additional insured’s failure to notify the insurer of the receipt…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Harwell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Puckett v. U.S. Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Fortis Benefits v. CantuTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- PAJ, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Gilbert Texas Construction, L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Tanner v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
- Don's Building Supply, Inc. v. Onebeacon Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Great American Insurance Co. v. PrimoTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- Chrysler Insurance Co. v. Greenspoint Dodge of Houston, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.