Legal Opinion

National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Crocker

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 2008No. 06-0868PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Willett

This insurance-coverage case comes to us on certified questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. 1 The principal issue is whether an insurer has a duty to notify an additional insured 2 of available liability coverage. On the facts presented, we conclude that Texas law imposes no such extra-contractual duty. We further hold that an insurer’s actual knowledge that an additional insured has been served with process does not establish as a matter of law that the insurer has not been prejudiced by the additional insured’s failure to notify the insurer of the receipt…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Harwell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Puckett v. U.S. Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Fortis Benefits v. CantuTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. PAJ, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Gilbert Texas Construction, L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Tanner v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Don's Building Supply, Inc. v. Onebeacon Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Great American Insurance Co. v. PrimoTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Chrysler Insurance Co. v. Greenspoint Dodge of Houston, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2009

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API