Legal Opinion
Henry v. Keegan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 15, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHotman, J.
William Henry, decedent husband of the claimant, entered the employ of the respondent Keegan at the latter’s dairy farm in Clintonville in May, 1934. He died on August 12th, following; it was claimed that his death resulted from injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment, and after hearings at which much medical evidence was received the compensation commissioner made a finding and award granting the claimant compensation at $9.50 per week for the period, three hundred and twelve weeks, provided by statute (General Statutes, § 5234) for death resulting from accident. Facts…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hartz v. Hartford Faience Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Driscoll v. Jewell Belting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Richardson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Morisi v. Ansonia Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jacques v. H. O. Penn MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Cashman v. McTernan School, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Fimiani v. Star Gallo Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Glenn v. Stop & Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Mages v. Alfred Brown, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.