Legal Opinion

United States v. James P. Doyle and Florence A. Doyle

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 6, 1972No. 710-70PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.

This is an action brought by the Government alleging occupancy trespass by defendants of a portion of the Pike National Forest and seeking injunctive relief against trespass and for removal of improvements from the property in dispute. The case was tried to the court. The trial court determined the boundary dispute in the Government’s favor on the basis of a dependent resurvey. Injunctive relief was granted and this appeal followed.

The Government owns land in the Pike National Forest including the SW)4 SE14, Section 1, Township 8 South, Range 71 West of the 6th…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Bogk v. GassertSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. United States v. State Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Den-Gar Enterprises v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Donald S. Powers v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Amoco Production Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  5. Wojahn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API