Legal Opinion

American Bank & Trust Co. v. Lichtenstein

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1976PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Order affirmed on the memorandum opinion at the Appellate Division.

This action is predicated on the series of promissory notes and not on the theory of an account stated, and accordingly judgment may be entered under CPLR 3213 (contrast Interman Ind. Prods, v R. S. M. Electron Power, 37 NY2d 151). We do not consider the additional contentions presented by appellants for the first time in this court (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev ed], § 162, p 629 et seq.).

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Interman Industrial Products, Ltd. v. R. S. M. Electron Power, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Citibank, National Ass'n v. LondonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1981
  2. Chester Color Separations, Inc. v. Trefoil Capital Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Bellevue Builders Supply, Inc. v. Audubon Quality Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Williamson v. ShangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. Hudson Valley Paper Co. v. La BelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API