Williamson v. Shang
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: We dismiss this appeal without prejudice to appellant Russo’s right to renew the application for reargument. Denial of a motion for leave to reargue is not appealable (Matter of Hooker v Town Bd. of Town of Guilderland, 60 AD2d 684; American Bank & Trust Co. v Lichtenstein, 48 AD2d 790, affd 39 NY2d 857; Roberts v Connelly, 35 AD2d 813; Matter of Bauer [MVAIC], 31 AD2d 239, 244). Although CPLR 2221 which deals with motions for leave to reargue contains no time limitations, it is well settled that a motion to reargue may not be used by a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re HuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Hooker v. Town BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. LichtensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. v. Bero Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. LichtensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Luming Cafe, Inc. v. BirmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Coffey v. United States Gypsum Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re the Arbitration between Cady & Aetna Life & Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1982
- Nulman v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Smith v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.