Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Division of State Lands v. Norris

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 17, 2002No. 97-2093; A107393PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Defendants, Bruce and Veronica Norris, appeal from the trial court’s judgment granting plaintiffs 1 request for injunctive and declaratory relief concerning defendants’ use of submerged and submersible lands 2 of the Columbia River. We review de novo, ORS 19.415(3), and affirm.

Defendants own property in Rainer, Oregon, that fronts the Columbia River. As a general matter, the state has title “to the submersible and submerged lands of all navigable streams and lakes in this state now existing or which may have been in existence in 1859 when the state was admitted to the Union, or at any time…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. May v. Chicago Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Shields v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. NORTHWEST STEELHEADERS ASS'N v. SimantelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Kessler v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. Kessler v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API