Resolution Trust Corp. v. Liebert
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
TAYLOR, District Judge.
Rejecting the majority trend of District Court authority, the court holds that, for purposes of FIRREA, the federal “no duty” rule does not survive the Supreme Court’s O’Melveny decision, and does not apply to post-FIRREA suits. The court also holds that, despite California’s rule against transfer of punitive damages claims, the RTC succeeds to the punitive damages claim of a bank it takes over.
I. BACKGROUND
The RTC brought this action based on the alleged negligence, gross negligence, and breach of fiduciary duty of Allan Liebert, a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BakerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1990
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Gilbert BiermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Jackson v. Rogers & WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- National Credit Union Administration v. First Union Capital Markets Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- In Re Papercraft Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MahajanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. RaffaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.