Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Raffa
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 20, 1995No. Civil 3:94CV21 (AVC)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COVELLO, District Judge.
Over objection, the recommended ruling is approved, ratified and adopted.
It is so ordered.
RECOMMENDED RULING ON FDIC’S MOTION TO STRIKE CERTAIN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES (#218)
EAGAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of the Community National Bank of Glastonbury (FDIC) moves, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f), to strike certain affirmative defenses contained in the answers of most defendants. 1 The defendants object. For the following reasons, the FDIC’s Motion to Strike is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. BACKGROUND
The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Shirley Small v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Gus S. Mijalis, and Gus S. MijalisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- National Credit Union Administration v. First Union Capital Markets Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Lexon Ins v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Lamoureux v. AnazaoHealth Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2000
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. HainesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.