Legal Opinion

People v. General

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided June 1, 2016Published

1Opinion of the Court

*728OPINION OF THE COURT

Andrew Borrok, J.

The defendant has moved to have the information (hereinafter defined) dismissed as (i) facially insufficient and (ii) as violating his right to a speedy trial pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 30.30. For the reasons set forth below, the defendant’s motion is denied in its entirety.

The Relevant Facts and Circumstances

On April 6, 2015, the defendant was charged with multiple serious violations of the Vehicle and Traffic Law1 and arraigned pursuant to an accusatory instrument that the court deemed an information. The matter was then adjourned to Part DWI…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. KendziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. People v. KalinNew York Court of Appeals · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API