Legal Opinion
Tas-T-Nut Co. v. Continental Nut Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 1954No. Civ. 8264PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.
This is an action brought by plaintiff and respondent against defendant and appellant based on a breach of contract and seeking damages therefor. After trial the court awarded judgment in favor of plaintiff and defendant appeals. The subject contract was one for the sale and delivery of California black wálnut kernels. Respondent was buyer and appellant was seller. The contract in memorandum form was dated January 19, 1949, and called for the sale of 30,000 pounds of nuts at 53 cents a pound. Appellant delivered all but 10,505 pounds and the failure to deliver that remainder is the breach…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Krauss Bros. Lumber v. Louis Bossert & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Alder v. DrudisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Pneucrete Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Squire's Department Store, Inc. v. DudumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Brunswick Corporation v. Harold VinebergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Charles J. Rounds Co. v. Joint Council of Teamsters No. 42California Supreme Court · 1971
- Local 659, I.A.T.S.E. v. Color Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Bertero v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.