Legal Opinion
Kollman v. Cell Tech International, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 31, 2012No. 0203774CV; A126612PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
Plaintiff Kollman, a shareholder of Cell Tech International, Inc., (Cell Tech) initiated this action against his former wife, Carpenter, the chief executive officer and president of Cell Tech, and Carpenter’s lawyer, Hateley, the chair of Cell Tech’s board of directors, alleging, as pertinent here, that they breached their fiduciary duties to him. As explained in more detail below, Kollman alleged both direct and derivative claims against Carpenter and Hateley. In accordance with a jury verdict, the court ultimately entered a limited judgment on a direct claim for breach of fiduciary duty…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Moran v. Household International, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- In Re Tri-Star Pictures, Inc., LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Gentile v. RossetteSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Les Kepley v. Gerald LanzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Munson v. Valley Energy Investment Fund, U. S., LPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Deep Photonics Corp. v. LaChapelleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- BLACK v. DIST. CT. (GOODCHILD)Nevada Supreme Court · 2025