Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

BLACK v. DIST. CT. (GOODCHILD)

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2025No. 88115Published

1Opinion of the Court

141 Nev., Advance Opinion g IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA SCOTT BLACK; JEROME NADAL; AND No. 88115 GEORGE SMITH, Petitioners, • vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED 7; IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF APR 17 205 • CLARK: AND THE HONORABLE JOSEPH ' HARDY, JR., DISTRICT COURT JUDGE. Respondents, and SEAN GOODCHILD: MIKE MEADER; DAVID MORTON; AND KLAUS MOELLER, Real Parties in Interest. Original petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus challenging a district court order denying a motion to dismiss by certain directors in a shareholders' action.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  2. International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Gentile v. RossetteSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  4. Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,041 Delgado Oil Company, Inc. v. Michael R. Torres, James R. ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  5. Parnes v. Bally Entertainment Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API