Legal Opinion

State v. Danh

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 6, 1993No. C1-93-86PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Appellant challenges trial court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas to three counts of assault in the second degree and one count of tampering with a witness in the first degree. Appellant claims that his pleas, which were part of a “package deal” involving other defendants, were not voluntary. We affirm the trial court’s holding that appellant’s pleas were voluntary, but modify the sentence given appellant.

FACTS

Appellant Hoang Muc Danh was charged in Olmsted County District Court with five counts of second degree assault, three counts of first degree…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Ruben R. Cortez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  4. State v. TrottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Thomas A. Kent v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. State v. DanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API