State v. Danh
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
516 N.W.2d 539 (1994)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Hoang Muc DANH, Petitioner, Appellant.
No. C1-93-86.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
May 20, 1994.
John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Susan Andrews, Asst. State Public Defender, Lawrence Hammerling, Deputy State Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, and Raymond Schmitz, Olmsted County Atty., Gary A. Gittus, Asst. County Atty., Rochester, for respondent.
Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
KEITH, Chief Justice.
This case raises the issue of whether the trial court abused…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.