Legal Opinion

State v. Danh

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 1994No. C1-93-86Published

1Opinion of the Court

516 N.W.2d 539 (1994)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,

v.

Hoang Muc DANH, Petitioner, Appellant.

No. C1-93-86.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

May 20, 1994.

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Susan Andrews, Asst. State Public Defender, Lawrence Hammerling, Deputy State Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, and Raymond Schmitz, Olmsted County Atty., Gary A. Gittus, Asst. County Atty., Rochester, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

This case raises the issue of whether the trial court abused…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. In Re IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API