Legal Opinion
Gray v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 24, 1991No. 90-553PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
A jury convicted appellant Gray of unlawful distribution of a controlled substance, D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(l) (1988 Repl. and 1991 Suppl.), and violation of the Bail Reform Act, id. § 23-1327 (1989). Appellant contends that (1) the trial court’s admission of expert testimony as to what constitutes a “usable amount” of controlled substance was manifestly erroneous and unduly prejudicial; (2) the government failed to produce sufficient evidence that the quantity of cocaine sold was a usable amount; and (3) the instructions on usable amount did not adequately inform the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Bernard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Edelin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Hawkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Griggs v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Pixley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Price v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Barnes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.