Legal Opinion

Thompson v. St. Paul City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 2, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendant fro, - an order of the district court tor Eamsey county, refusing a new trial after a trial before Brill, J., and judgment ordered for plaintiffs, enforcing a lien of $1,424.30 upon one of defendant’s lines of street railway.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Action by subcontractors to establish a lien for materials furnished for and used in the construction of one of defendant’s lines of street railway. The appeal is from an order refusing defendant a new trial. By finding, .as did the court below upon the trial of this case, that the allegations of the complaint were true, save as to some small matters not important here, it found, among other facts, that plaintiffs furnished and delivered the materials within the state of Minnesota. The assignment of error principally argued by appellant’s counsel is that not only was this finding unsupported…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fagan & Osgood v. Boyle Ice Machine Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Gaty v. CaseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Birmingham Iron Foundry v. Glen Cove Starch Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Cabbott v. RadfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Congdon v. KendallNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Albert and Harlow Inc. v. Great Northern Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. North American Co. v. St. Louis & S. F. R.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1916
  5. Mack v. Degraff & Roberts QuarriesOhio Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API