Hoeflich v. Chemical Bank

The motion to vacate the order of this court, dated March 3, 1989, is denied, with costs, and an additional award of $500 is imposed as sanctions upon the defendant-appellant executor.

The only issue of consequence in this case was whether the estate of the late ex-husband should be subject to a lump-sum payment of the full amount of alimony, based upon the plaintiff ex-wife’s life expectancy, or whether a reserve fund should be provided to pay the alimony that would come due in the future. (142 AD2d 374.)

Past-due amounts should have been paid. There are over 250 weekly installments, at $125 a…