Legal Opinion

Hoeflich v. Chemical Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 12, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Kupferman, J. P.

The parties entered into a separation agreement in 1973, which expressly provided that it would survive their divorce and be forever binding upon the parties and their legal representatives. It required that the husband pay alimony of $125 a week for the rest of the wife’s life or until she remarried.

At common law, the death of either the recipient or the obligor terminated prior court orders for alimony or maintenance as these are personal obligations. (See, Cohen v Cronin, 39 NY2d 42; Wilson v Hinman, 182 NY 408, 410; Freed and Brandes, Law and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. . HinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Cohen v. CroninNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Bauchle v. BauchleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  4. In re the Estate of BardolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Hoeflich v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hoeflich v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API