Legal Opinion

Esannason v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered September 27, 1989, which, inter alia, denied defendant New York City Housing Authority’s motion for counsel fees and sanctions pursuant to CPLR 8303-a and section 130-1.1 of the Uniform Rules for Trial Courts (22 NYCRR 130-1.1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs counsel has advanced a reasonable theory upon which suit was commenced against the defendant Housing Authority, despite being presented with the deed evidencing the fact that the playground where the infant plaintiff was injured had been conveyed by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoeflich v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Narins v. DeBrovnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Watson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API