Legal Opinion

Cook v. Burnquist

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 16, 1917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Phil Cook against J. A. A. Burnquist and others. On application for a preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, District Judge.

This suit is brought by the plaintiff against the members of the Public Safety Commission of Minnesota, the city of Minneapolis, its mayor its chief of police, and its city attorney, seeking to enjoin the defendants from enforcing an order of the Commission which is known as “Order No. 7,” or from enacting any ordinance or regulation enforcing the same, or from threatening to prosecute or from prosecuting for nonobservance of said Commission’s order.

The motion now under consideration is a motion made on behalf of the plaintiff for a preliminary injunction, and has been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. First National Bank v. Fellows Ex Rel. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Pullman Co. v. KnottSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Alexander v. McInnisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. SellMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. Board of Railroad CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Butcher v. MayburyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1925
  4. State ex rel. Burnquist v. District Court Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Herkness v. IrionDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API