Legal Opinion

Patel v. Khan

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1998No. 97-84PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Chief Justice.

Manesh and Chandu Patel, Kanti and Sula-bha Patel, and Key Bank (collectively, appellants) challenge the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of appellees, Zarif and Shamin Khan (Khans), in a third-party claim for breach of implied covenants in a warranty deed. Appellants also contend the district court erred in awarding Khans the settlement amount paid to the plaintiff in the underlying claim. We affirm.

ISSUES

Appellants present the following issues;

I. Were Khans constructively evicted from the Motel property by Patrick Green (“Green”) at a time when Green…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ahearn v. Anderson-Bishop PartnershipWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  2. First Southwestern Financial Services v. LairdWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Bolln v. La Prele Live Stock Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Whipple v. Commercial Bank of Blue HillNebraska Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McNeill Family Trust v. Centura BankWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. LOVELAND ESSENTIAL GROUP, LLC. v. Grommon Farms, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Wells v. Board of TrusteesWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API