Legal Opinion
Ahearn v. Anderson-Bishop Partnership
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided October 8, 1997No. 96-53, 96-217PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEHMAN, Justice.
These cases arise out of the sale of property owned by Francis B. Ahearn (Ahearn) near Wheatland, Wyoming. Ahearn contends that Anderson-Bishop Partnership (Partnership) wrongfully obtained confidential information from the First State Bank of Wheatland (Bank) and used that information to purchase Ahearn’s property at a grossly deflated price. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of the Partnership and the Bank. Finding the notice of appeal as to the Bank was not timely filed, we dismiss No. 96-217 in this consolidated appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We affirm…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Robert M. Hensley v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, a Corporation, Robert M. Hensley v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Kvenild v. TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Broderick Wood Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Duffy v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Shrum v. ZeltwangerWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. EM Nominee Partnership Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Bevan Ex Rel. Bevan v. FixWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights to AGS and AMLD, Minor Children. SASWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Robinson v. PacificorpWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Wadi Petroleum, Inc. v. Ultra Resources, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.