Legal Opinion

Ricker v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 5, 1935PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while travelling in an automobile on a public highway in the town of Arlington, in this Commonwealth, through the alleged negligence of the defendant, its servants or agents in the operation and maintenance of one of its street cars. By an amendment to the declaration it was further alleged by the plaintiff, in substance, that another automobile was caused to collide with the motor vehicle of the plaintiff “due to the gross, wilful and wanton misconduct” on the part of the defendant, its agents or servants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Di Cecca v. BucciMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Topf v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Doyle v. GoldbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Munson v. Bay State Dredging & Contracting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Crean v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Brodmerkle v. GorolskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. LeBlanc v. Cutler Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API