State ex rel. Northern Transportation Co. v. Railroad Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
The relator concedes that the provisions of the law conferring power on the Railroad Commission to regulate common carriers by motor vehicles are valid. The only portions of the statute which are attacked are those which provide for the ton-mile tax.
Streets and highways belong to the public and are constructed for the use of the public. But their use for the purpose of conducting a business for gain is a special and extraordinary use which may be permitted only upon such conditions ás the legislature may prescribe. Packard v. Banton, 264 U. S. 140, 144, 68 Lawy. Ed. 596, 608, 44 Sup. Ct. 257.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Clark v. PoorSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Interstate Busses Corp. v. BlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Wisconsin Allied Truck Owners Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Iowa Motor Vehicle Ass'n v. Board of Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Nance v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Rocky Mountain Lines, Inc. v. CochranNebraska Supreme Court · 1941