Legal Opinion

Sheldon, Kamm & Co. v. Bremer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1911No. Docket No. 6PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Bay; Collins, J. Bill by Sheldon, Eamm & Company against Frederick J. Bremer and others to enforce a mechanic’s lien. From a decree dismissing the bill as to all defendants except said Bremer, the complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, C. J.

It is only when land is owned by husband and wife, by entireties, or when the land is held and occupied as a homestead, that a contract for a building thereon is required to be in writing, and signed by both the husband and wife, in order that a lien may attach to either land or building. In every other case the contract .for the improvement may be written or unwritten, express or implied. If made with the owner, part owner, or lessee, of the land, a lien is created upon the improvement and also upon the entire interest of such owner, part owner, or lessee in and to the land, “at the time…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burman v. EwaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Barry v. BarryNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Godfrey Lumber Co. v. KlineMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. F. M. Sibley Lumber Co. v. LettermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Leverenz Lumber & Building Co. v. RickelsMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API