Godfrey Lumber Co. v. Kline
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Kalamazoo; Knappen, J. Bill by the Godfrey Lumber Company against Belle E. Kline and George W. McConn to enforce a mechanics’ lien. From an order sustaining a demurrer to complainant’s bill and dismissing the same, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This case has been in this court before, and is reported in 160 Mich. 565 (125 N. W. 682). A reading of the opinion will be necessary to an understanding of the questions nowpresented. After the case was here, an amended bill of complaint was filed, and Mr. McConn was made defendant. The defendant Kline demurred to the bill of complaint for something like 20 reasons. The demurrer was sustained. The complainant did not indicate a desire to further amend the bill of complaint, and a decree was entered dismissing it.
As to the reasons stated by defendant Kline in her demurrer, counsel say:
“We do…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gibbs v. HanchetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Smalley v. Northwestern Terra-Cotta Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Union Trust Co. v. CasserlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Le Roy v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Casserly v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robert v. Clapp Co. v. FoxOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- Burman v. EwaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Central Trust Co. v. George Lueders & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Zilz v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Hartwick Lumber Co. v. ChonoskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.