Burman v. Ewald
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Gilday, J., presiding. Bill by Joseph J. Burman and another, copartners as Burman Brothers, against Frank Ewald, Mathilda Ewald and the Detroit Savings Bank to enforce a mechanic’s lien. From a decree for complainants, defendants Ewald appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
The bill in this case was filed for the purpose of foreclosing a mechanic’s lien. On April 19, 1913, complainants entered into a contract with *294the defendants Frank and Mathilda Ewald, for the erection of a building to cost $4,450. It was the claim of Peter Burman, one of the complainants, that he submitted plans and specifications to the defendants which were finally made' satisfactory. He testified that he had no dealing with the defendant Frank Ewald, as said Ewald had told him that:
“All business is left to Mrs. Ewald. I don’t bother myself about the building at all. Whatever business…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bauer v. LongMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Lacy v. Piatt Power & Heat Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Restrick Lumber Co. v. WyrembolskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Godfrey Lumber Co. v. KlineMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Frolich v. BlackstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hansen-Snyder Co. v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Long v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Wallich Lumber Co. v. GoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Burton Drywall, Inc. v. KaufmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Spartan Asphalt Paving Co. v. Grand Ledge Mobile Home ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.