Legal Opinion · Dissent

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pioneer Seafoods Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 25, 1940No. 9388Published

1DissentWilbur, Circuit Judge

I dissent. The basic question is as to whether the Casualty Company was bound by contract to defend a certain action against the Sea Foods Company by one Hanseth, whose complaint alleged that he was suffering from tuberculosis contracted while he was employed by the latter company on its fishing boat as a result of its negligence in' supplying him with unhealthful sleeping quarters and insufficient nourishment.

The answer to this question depends upon the construction of a policy of insurance issued by the Casualty Company to the Sea Foods Company. That in turn depends upon whether Hanseth’s…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Mauchline v. State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Lickleider v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  5. Horsfall v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1903

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API