Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Johns

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 1935No. 18203PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

KREUGER, Judge.

On the 23rd day of May, 1935, the city commissioners of the City of Harlingen passed and approved an ordinance which, omitting the formal parts, reads as follows:

“Section 1. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to distribute or cause to be distributed in the city of Harlingen, any handbill, or any printed or written advertising matter by placing or causing to be placed in any automobiles or in any mail box, or in any yard, or on any porch, or in any kind of door, or between any screen door and other door just beyond said screen door, or in any part of any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. San Francisco Shopping News Co. v. City of South San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chrestensen v. ValentineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. Ex Parte RodgersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Chrestensen v. ValentineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  4. Ex Parte RodgersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API