Legal Opinion

San Francisco Shopping News Co. v. City of South San Francisco

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 19, 1934No. 7125PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.

Since the present appeal is from a decree dismissing the appellant’s amended bill in equity, on motion of the appellees, we shall set forth in some detail the allegations of the bill. While it is true that, for the purpose of this case, all well-pleaded allegations of the bill are to be taken as true, as we proceed in our examination of that document we will point out certain averments that, in our opinion, are not statements of faets, but mere conclusions. As will be seen, however, our views as to such averments have not been controlling in our determinar tion of the…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. HubbardDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
  3. Nev-Cal Electric Securities Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  4. In Re ShearDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956
  5. Buxbom v. City of RiversideDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API