Legal Opinion

Chrestensen v. Valentine

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 24, 1941No. 358PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

This case presents another aspect of the much litigated question as to the validity of municipal prohibitions against the distribution of handbills in streets and public places. Lovell v. City of Griffin, 303 U.S. 444, 58 S.Ct. 666, 82 L.Ed. 949; Schneider v. State of New Jersey, Town of Irvington, 308 U.S. 147, 60 S.Ct. 146, 84 L.Ed. 155; Hague v. C. I. O., 307 U.S. 496, 518, 59 S.Ct. 954, 83 L.Ed. 1423. The prohibition here involved is found in New York City Sanitary Code, § 318 (Health Department Regulations, Art. III, § 318), but with a saving sentence limiting its…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Valentine v. ChrestensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Hoffman v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Perkins v. Endicott Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. Eastern Wine Corporation v. Winslow-Warren, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. Irwin v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API