Legal Opinion
Fries v. Parr
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Action by Arthur G. Fries against Frank Parr and another. Judgment of dismissal.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
The defendants had, in a small way, manufactured some hardware specialties known as saw sets and saw tools, and had some unfilled orders from third parties for these articles. Frank Parr, one of the defendants, came into contact with the plaintiff, and had some preliminary negotiations with him looking toward the plaintiff advaqging sufficient money to buy material and machines for making and marketing the articles in question. These negotiations resulted in the parties making the following agreement:
*222“Bill of Sale.
“Agreement made and entered into this 1st day of April, 1907, by and between…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Curtis v. . GokeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Wood v. . Whitehead Brothers Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Oil Creek Railroad v. the Atlantic & Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scotton v. WrightCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1922
- Dutch Maid Bakeries, Inc. v. SchleicherWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
- Tooey v. C. L. Percival Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Lantieri Beauty Salon, Inc. v. YaleNew York Supreme Court · 1938