People v. Allen
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDADE
The defendant, Peri Allen, appeals from his conviction for burglary in the circuit court of Will County. The sole issue on appeal is whether it was error for the defendant to be forced to wear an electronic security belt as a restraining device at trial. The defendant urges the court to find error and remand his case for a new trial. For the following reasons, we find that it was error for the defendant to be restrained absent an explicit finding of necessity pursuant to People v. Boose, 66 Ill. 2d 261, 362 N.E.2d 303 (1977), and reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
The State’s brief…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. KeeneIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. BooseIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. StaleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. McDonaldAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- People v. StricklandAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- People v. BucknerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- People v. BarneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.