Legal Opinion

People v. Buckner

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 13, 2005No. 3-03-0611 RelPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdridge

The defendant, Alfred Buckner, was convicted of burglary (720 ILCS 5/19 — 1(a) (West 2002)) and sentenced to six years’ imprisonment. On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court erred in ordering him to wear an electronic security belt as a restraining device without first making a finding of necessity pursuant to People v. Boose, 66 Ill. 2d 261, 362 N.E.2d 303 (1977). The defendant asks this court to remand his case for a new trial. While we find that the trial court erred in failing to conduct a Boose analysis, we do not order a new trial. Rather, we remand this case to the trial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. DuranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. HerrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. ThurowIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. BooseIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. StricklandAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  2. People v. BarneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. People v. CurtisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. People v. BarneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. People v. BucknerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API