Legal Opinion
Young-Montenay, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 2, 1994No. 93-5095PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
Young-Montenay, Inc. (“Young-Monte-nay”) sought to recover costs incurred because of alleged government-caused delays on a boiler renovation project for the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”). Upon denial of its claims by the contracting officer, Young-Montenay sought relief from the United States Court of Federal Claims. In an amended answer, the government raised a special plea in fraud pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2514, and asserted counterclaims, based upon the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, and the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. (1993). On January…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- McCarthy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Paxson Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Charles T. Hutchins v. Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer Louis Delucia John Does "1" Through John Does "3" Joan Lavery. Charles T. Hutchins v. Abc Corp., Sealed. Charles T. HutchinsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Commercial Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- United States Ex Rel. Thompson v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
- Daewoo Engineering and Const. Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.